AP Lit FRQ1/FRQ2

What did you guys write about for FRQ1/2?

For FRQ1, I wrote about how the speaker was using the contrasting overwhelming/divine yet solitary nature of the star, and how there's two interpretations of the poem (it could be about a literal star or be about a woman)

For FRQ2, I wrote about how Mike was both reactive and autopiloting through his art, but was deeply passionate about it under the surface, so it wasn't some supernatural coincidence that everything was ending up the way it did--it was a result of his passion/love for art

I think I did good, wondering how other ppl interpreted FRQ1