While I deeply value Bashar’s wisdom and philosophy, the ‘open contact’ narrative and failed predictions feel hard to take seriously. Discuss.

I want to start by saying that I deeply value the wisdom and philosophical insights that Bashar, channeled by Darryl Anka, has shared over the years. His teachings on self-empowerment, following your excitement, and embracing authenticity have profoundly impacted many lives, including my own. However, I can’t help but feel increasingly skeptical about his “open contact” narrative and the repeated predictions surrounding this idea. For those unfamiliar, Bashar often speaks about an impending era of open extraterrestrial contact that is supposedly just around the corner. Yet, despite years of anticipation and numerous “timelines” provided for these events, there’s been no tangible evidence or clear fulfillment of these predictions.

This isn’t just a minor issue for me—it’s a significant sticking point. The constant postponements or reinterpretations of these timelines begin to feel less like insightful guidance and more like an ever-shifting goalpost. While I acknowledge that concepts like free will, probabilities, and shifting timelines are central to his teachings, it feels like these explanations conveniently absolve him of accountability when his predictions fail to materialize. It raises questions about the credibility of his more speculative claims, even if the core of his philosophy remains helpful and practical.

I’m left wondering: is the “open contact” narrative a genuine foresight, or is it more akin to a compelling story that keeps people engaged?

Another point of criticism often raised about Bashar is the hefty price tag associated with attending Darryl Anka’s live events and seminars. While spiritual growth and enlightenment are undoubtedly valuable, it feels counterintuitive for such profound, universal wisdom to come with such a high financial barrier. Many argue that charging hundreds of dollars for tickets creates an exclusivity that seems at odds with the very principles of abundance, accessibility, and collective evolution that Bashar teaches. It raises the question of whether these events prioritize genuine connection and dissemination of wisdom or cater more to financial gain. For individuals who may genuinely benefit from these teachings but cannot afford the costs, it can feel alienating and contradictory to the inclusive and empowering philosophy Bashar espouses.

Respectfully, I think it’s fair to question whether this aspect of his work serves as a distraction from the truly transformative wisdom he offers.