Stack and a half misinformation

Picture 1: This shows the stacking of a OEM 10rd 43x magazine

Picture 2: this confirms the primers are not vertically stacked (oem 43x)

Picture 3: this shows the stacking of a PSA micro dagger magazine

Picture 4: this shows the stacking of a OEM Glock 17 magazine. Is there a difference vs the PSA magazine?

Picture 5: this is to give an illustration of the different internal widths of the magazines

Picture 6: shows a 15rd PSA magazine vs a 15rd mec-gar CZ-75 magazine. The CZ magazine has a wider internal width, but require more length for the same capacity. They are almost identical external width

Picture 7: shows different followers. Notice how much taller the mec-gar follower is.

All of this is to illustrate:

1: the OEM 43x is a stack+. Call it a a 1.25-1.5 stack idc, but it isn't a single stack like a 1911/lcp

2: the PSA magazine is the same internal width as the steel insert in a OEM "double stack" Glock magazine. If the OEM Glock is double stack, so is the PSA.

3: there is more to factor into capacity than external dimensions. Namely, internal width and follower design.

4: the PSA follower is a near copy of the Glock gen 4 follower I have displayed, because the magazine body's internal width is also near identical to the steel insert of a OEM Glock magazine

It isn't magic, it isn't revolutionary. 1.5 stack is marketing, and seeing people call the 43x a single stack, the PSA a 1.5, and the Glock 19/17/26 a double stack is wrong.

Thank you for coming to my testing talk. Bring on athe down votes because Reddit hates the objective truth