SA?

I just watched the documentary “The Case of Jon Benêt Ramsay” or something. In the documentary they completely discount the sexual assault. They claim that any trauma Is so minuscule that it is irrelevant and that any blood is either old/from a nose bleed. I’m a little confused about this part. The SA never really fit for me anyway but it seems like there is so much conflicting information about what actually happened. Is there any concrete evidence of SA or is all of that up in the air. It seems like even the statements about fecal smearing or past SA are not trustworthy sources. I’m a little confused about this part of the crime tbh.

It does seem off that a pedophile would break into the home, write a three page ransom and brutally murder her but only very minimally assault her. Don’t they typically murder after the assault? It also doesn’t really fit the theory that the parents murdered her. It just doesn’t fully make sense. The most I’ve come up with is that the children were being SA’d by someone, causing Burke to be acting out sexually on his sister. Which cause the fight that killed her, while also explaining the very minimal SA.

I don’t know