Why would HMTK mention them?

This is an exceptionally silly newsletter article from The Daily Beast that is trying to stir up the Windsor v Sussex shizzle.

The King’s Speech is traditionally about the WORK that WORKING ROYALS do on behalf of Britain, in Britain. Why would he mention the Montecito moaners? Was KCIII supposed to send an olive branch with a sweet nod to their faux Royal tours? The book that accused him of being a racist? The Espy award? The jam? Netflix?

And who is criticizing him? Ugh! This makes me want to block The Daily Beast.