Question for non vegan antinatalists

I have a question for non-vegan antinatalists. Antinatalists argue that bringing a child into the world is wrong because the child doesn't give consent to be born and experience suffering.

However, if that reasoning is valid for humans, why does it not apply to animals?

Why is it not considered wrong to end life of an animal without its consent?

and why is bringing an animal into existence (such as through forced breeding) not seen as wrong either, also given that even the animal's parent cannot consent to giving birth?

You guys are torturing sentient life for your selfish reasons who would've never been born.

I’m genuinely curious about how non vegan antinatalists live with the hypocrisy?