How Do Different Premise Combinations Affect the Validity of Deductive Arguments?

Hey everyone! I’m working on understanding different types of deductive arguments and how validity plays out with various combinations of premises and conclusions. I’m hoping to get a better grasp of these distinctions, and I’d love to hear your thoughts or examples of the following types of arguments:

• A valid argument with one true premise, one false premise, and a false conclusion. • A valid argument with one true premise, one false premise, and a true conclusion. • An invalid argument with two true premises and a false conclusion. • An invalid argument with two true premises and a true conclusion. • A valid argument with two false premises and a true conclusion. • An invalid argument with two false premises and a true conclusion. • An invalid argument with one true premise, one false premise, and a true conclusion. • A valid argument with two true premises and a true conclusion.

I’m trying to understand how these combinations affect the validity of an argument, and it would be really helpful if anyone could share examples or insights into each case. Thanks a lot for any guidance!