CMV: A lack of dating experience should not be seen as a red flag in dating even at ages 25+.

Of course, people can decide what their dating dealbreakers are and have absolute power here but that doesn't mean every decision is a good decision.

In my opinion, I think there are certain reasons that someone might not get into a relationship til 25+.

The base of what it tends to come down to is that many people assume a personality flaw when someone is single for that kind of time, though I think this is misguided.

A person may've had a rough upbringing which made dating very difficult but has sorted their life out. To the contrary, I'd probably think it was admirable that someone waited til they were more stable to date. It can show care for themselves and their future partners.

Alternatively, someone may just be physically unattractive. It is entirely plausible that someone is just that ugly or short to the point that they weren't able to find someone to be with for their SO. If that luck changes at an older age, I don't think the prospective partner should consider their previous lack of experience a red flag. It's not their fault nobody wanted them romantically for such a long time, especially if it's a more genetic thing like being short.

I feel like instead of looking at dating experience, it is much better to look at things like how they interact with friends, their family if they keep in touch, and just their personality overall. I don't think dating experience or especially the lack thereof needs to be considered.

As far as how I think dating experience should be discussed in relationships, I feel like it should be don't ask don't tell from both sides. I don't think there's particular benefit to knowing this. The one exception would be if one or both have kids, as the kids are likely still an important part of their lives. Else, past relationships or the lack thereof can stay in the past.